Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/roboticslab/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Evaluation of Artificial Mouths in Social Robots - RoboticsLab

Evaluation of Artificial Mouths in Social Robots

External link: IEEE Xplore link

Download file: main_clean_text
Download: BibTeX | Plain Text

Description

The external aspects of a robot affect how people behave and perceive it
while interacting. In this paper, we study the importance of the mouth
displayed by a social robot and explore how different designs of an
artificial LED-based mouths alter the participants’ judgments of a
robot’s attributes and their attention to the robot’s message. We
evaluated participants’ judgments of a speaking robot under four
conditions: 1) without a mouth; 2) with a static smile; 3) with a
vibrating, wave-shaped mouth; and 4) with a moving, human-like mouth. A
total of 79 participants evaluated their perceptions of an on-video
robot showing one of the four conditions. The results show that the
presence of a mouth, as well as its design, alters the perception of the
robot. In particular, the presence of a mouth makes the robot to be
perceived more lifelike and less sad. The human-like mouth was the one
participants liked the most and, along with the smile, they were the
friendliest ones. On the contrary, participants rated the mouthless
robot and the one with the wave-like mouth as the most dangerous ones.